Turkish Government In Support of IPOB & Sitting At Home May 30th 2017

                       
     The Government of Turkey In Support Of IPOB

Please take your time to read this Press Release and share very widely.
Press Statement
12 April 2017

PAUL ARKWRIGHT AND THE INDIVISIBILITY OF NIGERIA: A LESSON IN INTERNATIONAL LAW 
We Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) worldwide led by Mazi Nnamdi Kanu wish to state that the substance of this press statement is traceable to the diplomatic blunder committed by no less a person than the British High Commissioner to Nigeria, His Excellency, Mr. Paul Arkwright recently in Kogi State of Nigeria where he was reported to have delivered a public lecture on the topic: "Brexit: Lessons, Challenges and Opportunities for Nigeria" at the Federal University, Lokoja, on Thursday, 6th April, 2017.

Asked about the position of Britain on the groups pushing for independence from Nigeria, the envoy said the UK remained firm in its support for one Nigeria. We have therefore taken time to painstakingly analyse this statement credited to the British Envoy and we find it very unfortunate and distasteful that a seasoned diplomat of Mr. Arkwright’s standing could have displayed such ignorance of international law and protocol.

From our very careful observation, we are of the view that two factors could have been responsible for Mr. Arkwright’s uncharacteristic diplomatic blunder. The first that immediately comes to mind is ignorance and the second, which is equally unfortunate, even more so than the first, is mischief. Riding on these assumptions, we shall now take the liberty of this press statement to address these two possible inadequacies which His Excellency might be suffering from and to clear every doubt his stance may have engendered in the minds of a largely undiscerning and docile populace.

PRESUMED IGNORANCE:We would want to presume that the statement of Mr. Arkwright may have been influenced by that opening phrase in the Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar (Nigerian) 1999 Constitution which reads as follows: “We the people of the Federal Republic of Nigeria Having firmly and solemnly resolved, to live in unity and harmony as one indivisible and indissoluble sovereign nation under God,…”
We make haste therefore to inform Mr. Arkwright that even the most poorly lettered man on the streets of Lokoja (venue of Mr. Arkwright’s public lecture) agree that the Amended Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar 1999 Constitution lied about itself and that the first lie in that Constitution is the wasteful phrase: “We the people”.

It is the duty of IPOB to clear the illusions this deceptive phrase might have planted in the pliable mind of Mr. Arkwright and others like him. No doubt, the above phrase seeks to convey the misleading impression that ordinary people of Nigeria willingly in a conference, meeting or assembly convened by Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar somewhere in Abuja in 1999 agreed to vest immutable non-negotiable sovereignty on the Nigerian nation through the instrumentality of the said 1999 Constitution. This is a blatant lie, deception and fraud concocted by self serving individuals in Nigeria to deceive themselves and those not enlightened enough to know what is being done in their name.

Not minding the obvious limitations and inherent defects of the Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar 1999 Constitution by virtue of the lie "We the people....." preamble, we recognise the centrality of sovereignty in the field of International law. However, as rigid and important as this concept may be to the proponents of One Nigeria, it still admits and recognises some notable exceptions. It is therefore not immutable and cannot as a result be construed in absolute terms. In other words, sovereignty of states under international law is not cast in iron and can be broken or dissolved.

The point IPOB is making here is to the effect that, in the exercise of the sovereign powers bestowed on it, an artificial creation like the Nigerian state or indeed any other country, can limit its own sovereignty or surrender a part of same. The truth as it stands today is that the Nigerian state, has out of its own volition already surrendered Nigerian sovereignty over Bakassi Peninsular, which therefore enables any part of Nigeria or section thereof to secede when they so decide, contrary to the wishes and ambitions of the neo-colonialists like Mr. Arkwright. This is equally true and remains same for even Great Britain whom Mr. Arkwright represents in Nigeria. Let us explain.

We will use English judicial authorities to convey the message home to the British Envoy before we turn to the Nigerian judicial authorities. In the case of Blackburn vs. Attorney-General, Court of Appeal (Civil Division) [1971] EWCA Civ J0510-2, [1971] 1 WLR 1037 where Mr. Blackburn was concerned about the application of Her Majesty's government to join the European Common Market by seeking to sign up to the Treaty of Rome. He brought two actions against Her Majesty's Government Edward Heath through the then Attorney-General, in which he sought declarations to the effect that, by signing the Treaty of Rome, Her Majesty's Government will surrender in part the sovereignty of The Crown in Parliament (British people) forever. He canvassed the view that in so doing the Government will be acting in breach of the law. Mr. Blackburn pointed out that many regulations made by the European Economic Community will become automatically binding on the people of Great Britain: and that all the Courts of Great Britain, including the House of Lords, will have to follow the decisions of a foreign European Court in certain defined respects, including the drafting of the Treaty itself. To buttress his point Mr. Blackburn made reference to an earlier decision by the Court of Common Market Costa v. E. N. E. L. ( 1964 Common Market Law Reports, 425) in February, 1964, in which the European Court in its judgment said that:
".….the member states, albeit within limited spheres, have restricted their sovereign rights and created a body of law applicable both to their nationals and to themselves".

When this contention over the sanctity of sovereignty came before the Court of Appeal in England, a majority of the panel of judges (Lord Denning dissenting) reasoned and held that the power to enter into Treaties was itself a power of the Crown acting on advice from ministers. In simple terms, it means that sovereignty can indeed be tampered with by a government and as such cannot be held to be sacrosanct.

THE POSITION WITH THE NIGERIA STATE: There is no doubt that the Nigerian Head of State (President) has the powers to enter into treaties with foreign nations (both bilateral and multilateral) which is binding on the whole Nigerian state. Section 12 of the Amended Gen. Abdulsalami Abubakar 1999 Constitution has laid down the procedure for the domestication of such treaties as a condition precedent to their activation as a law in Nigeria. There is no question regarding the binding nature of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (providing among others for the right to self-determination) on the Nigerian state. Equally true is the fact that not only that Nigeria is a signatory to the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, the Nigerian Parliament has entrenched the said Charter as part of the corpus juris of the country by way of domestication in compliance with the dictates of section 12 of the Constitution earlier referred to. It should be noted that Article 20 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Right most lucidly proclaims in clear language that:
“All peoples shall have the right to existence. They shall have the unquestionable and inalienable right to self-determination. They shall freely determine their political status and shall pursue their economic and social development according to the policy they have freely chosen.”
As we earlier stated, the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Right became part of Nigerian laws by virtue of African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement Act), Cap 10, Laws of the Federation (LFN), 1990. The status of this very important legislation came up for interpretation before the Nigerian Supreme Court in the case of Abacha vs. Fawehinmi (2001) 51 WRN 29; (2000) 6 NWLR 228, (2002) 3 LRC 296, (2001) 1 CHR 95. In answering that crucial question, Justice Ogundare (of blessed memory) delivering the lead judgment of the full panel of the Nigerian Supreme Court had this to say:“Where, however, the treaty is enacted into law by the National Assembly, as was the case with the African Charter which is incorporated into our municipal (i.e. domestic) law by the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights (Ratification and Enforcement) Act Cap. 10 Laws of the Federation of Nigeria 1990 (hereinafter is referred to simply as Cap. 10), it becomes binding and our Courts must give effect to it like all other laws falling within the Judicial power of the Courts. By Cap. 10 the African Charter is now part of the laws of Nigeria and like all other laws the Courts must uphold it. The Charter gives to citizens of member states of the Organisation of African Unity rights and obligations, which rights and obligations are to be enforced by our Courts, if they must have any meaning… No doubt Cap. 10 is a statue with international flavour. Being so, therefore, I would think that if here is a conflict between it and another statue, its provisions will prevail over those of that other statue for the reason that it is presumed that the legislature does not intend to breach an international obligation. To this extent I agree with their Lordships of the Court below that the Charter possesses "a greater vigour and strength" than any other domestic statue.”

It is important to point out that the provision of Section 12 of the Nigerian Constitution declaring null and void any treaty entered between Nigeria and any other country/countries will not acquire the force of law in Nigeria until domesticated, holds no water in international law, nor before International Courts/Tribunals. What this simply means is that the Nigerian state cannot, under any conceivable circumstance, resign from its obligation to honour any international treaty it freely entered into by citing its anachronistic domestic laws as a defence. In other words, Nigeria cannot point to its own domestic laws as constituting a limitation to the fulfillment of its obligation under any international treaty it freely entered into. Put more correctly, domestic laws cannot be allowed to constitute a drag on the operation of foreign laws under which a state party has undertaken to fulfill international obligations. Indeed, this is the heart and soul of Article 7 of the 1969 Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties under International law.

The argument put up by the Government of Nigeria to the effect that Bakassi Peninsula could not be yielded up to Cameroun on the principal ground that section 12 of the Nigerian Constitution would need to be complied with so as to effectively delete Bakassi as a Local Government by way of Constitutional amendment was roundly rejected by the International Court of Justice. (See generally Cameroon v. Nigeria, ICJ Reports, 2002, pp. 303, 346.) Today, Bakassi Peninsula, formerly of Cross-Rivers State of Nigeria, is no more a Nigerian territory even without any constitutional amendment. The Nigerian Supreme Court has now accepted this position as a correct representation of the law binding on the Nigerian state.

A practical demonstration of this acceptance is made manifest in the case of Attorney-General of Cross-Rivers State vs. Attorney-General of the Federation and Anor (2005) 15 NWLR (Pt.947) pg 71 where the effect of the ICJ judgment on the erstwhile littoral segment of Cross-River State was captured thus;
“The effect of the judgment of the International Court of Justice dated 10/10/2002 on the land and maritime boundary between Nigeria and Cameroun is that it has wiped off what use to be the estuarine sector of Cross River State as a result of which the State is hemmed in by the new international boundary between Nigeria and Cameroun. That being the case, there seems to not be any estuarine boundary between Akwa Ibom State and Cross River State with the result that Cross River no longer has a seaward boundary.”
In fact, in a later 2012 case of Attorney-General of Cross-Rivers State vs. Attorney-General of the Federation and Anor, the Supreme Court (SC.250/2009), speaking through Rhodes-Vivour, J.S.C., was more punchy when it eloquently declared with a tone of finality that;
“This Court has no jurisdiction to decide ownership of oil wells located on oil rich Bakasi Peninsula for the simple reason that Bakasi Peninsula is foreign territory. It is Cameroun land. Supreme Court jurisdiction is restricted to Nigeria land.”
SUMMATION:

The jurisprudential beacon offered by the galaxy of authorities examined above leaves us with the only conviction that Mr. Paul Arkwright’s position is out of tune with contemporary realities which reflects poorly on his standing as a seasoned diplomat. He must work hard to redeem his image which is being seen by many concerned Africans as one steeped in gross incompetence devoid of any intellectual depth. A good starting point will be for him to acknowledge that this Nigerian state as presently constituted, created by his fellow countryman Frederick Luggard, has voluntarily, by domesticating Article 20 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Right, accepted to give fillip to any section of the country wishing to secede by facilitating the exercise of that undeniable right through referendum as was recently done in the United Kingdom, where Mr. Arkwright comes from and is representing, regarding Scotland. 
The second duty on the part of Mr. Paul Arkwright is for him to wake up to his real duties by impressing upon the Nigerian Government the imperative of discharging its obligation (under UN Declaration and African Charter) of facilitating a referendum for a peaceful Biafra exit from Nigeria. 
It is our hope that Mr. Paul Arkwright appreciates this new reality, otherwise we would be forced to draw the alternative inference that he set out ab initio to cause mischief and test the will and resolve of IPOB. This would be most unfortunate if it were to be so since the pervasive consequences of such an action will not spare anyone trying to subvert the will of the Biafran people. For record purposes, the Conservative Party led British Government of Theresa May has nothing to fear from the emergence of Biafra, after all we Biafrans are the most Anglophile of all races in Africa. Should Mr. Arkwright continue to pursue his flawed and misguided adventure of insisting on the indivisibility of their 'One Nigeria', it would be fatal and suicidal because we would never ever stop until Biafra is liberated. We wish to stop here.
SIGNED:
Dr. Ikenna Chinaka
Mrs Grace Ukpai
IPOB Spokespersons

Please SHARE!
The Support Biafra Project.

 Biafra Recognition: IPOB commends Turkey for supporting Biafra

THE Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) has commended the government and people of Turkey for their support towards the restoration of Biafra.

IPOB media and publicity secretary, Mr. Emma Powerful said in a statement in Awka yesterday that the Turkish government had on April 7, 2017 recognized the people of Biafra in Turkey and the IPOB leader, Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, who is being detained at the Kuje Prison, Abuja.
He said the Turkish government had also publicly pledged to put in motion an effective strategy that would help in the restoration of Biafra and facilitate the release of Kanu and others being detained along with him.

According to Powerful, Kanu had on two occasions, been granted bail by two separate courts, but was yet to be released by the government.

He said: “This recognition and support from the Turkish government proves to the entire world that the unique model of liberation adopted by our leader, Nnamdi Kanu, is yielding the desired results because Biafra is at an unprecedented height in terms of global acceptability and grassroots awareness.”

Powerful added that the Turkish government had also promised IPOB under the leadership of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, that it would take the struggle for Biafra independence to the United Nations and other relevant organizations in the world, adding that Turkey’s action had opened the way for other countries of the world to stand bold to defend the people of Biafra in Nigeria.

Egbo Daniel

BIAFRA: COL. JOE 

ACHUZIA KICKS 

AGAINST 

ASSOCIATING 

POLITICS WITH 

BIAFRA; URGES ALL 

TO 

STAND WITH 

NNAMDI KANU

In a meeting held last week in Asaba at Col. Joe Achuzai’s residence; he came heavily on those associating Biafra agitation with politics and urged them to drop their unhealthy moves and stand with Nnamdi Kanu.

He was disappointed that people that should be playing elderly role are busy scampering for one political ‘nonsense’ or another. Speaking to the members of IPOB that paid him a solidarity visit as the only living leader of the 1967 class, he expressed satisfaction with everything Nnamdi Kanu is doing and urged the people of Biafra to continue to show solidarity with Nnamdi Kanu.

“I fought this war for Biafra and I shall continue to fight; Biafra will be restored in my life time, Effiong is no more, Ojukwu is no more and I am the next leader when it comes to Biafra” he said. He was extremely critical of the people that try to form a new body or impose a leader on Indigenous People of Biafra that already have a strong and unshakable leadership.

According to him; fighting for Nnamdi Kanu’s release should be the priority of everyone and when he comes out, he will definitely carry everybody along.
According to our sources that attended the meeting; Achuzia in the capacity of the leader of 1967 class passed a vote of confidence on Nnamdi Kanu. He refused to mention names but pleaded the people bringing politics to the people of Biafra to desist from that and face the agitation once and for all. He believes politics will never benefit the people except few gladiators as it is always the winner takes it all.

In the past; he had faulted 1999 Nigerian constitution and fraudulent census and as reasons Biafra cannot be achieved through politics and why the people of Biafra shall continue to be shortchanged in Nigeria. He further urged political gladiators and gluttons to quench their taste and control their head. He noted that he is baffled at why any sane mind who wants Biafra will continue to fight against Nnamdi Kanu.

He highlighted the Court case in Owerri and said the case will further help Nnamdi Kanu if won and urged for support of the matter which he contracted Billie Human Rights and is looking to expunge the group which he once said had failed woefully.

“I Stand with Nnamdi Kanu” he quoted and solicited for understanding among the various agitating groups. He disclosed that once Nnamdi Kanu is out; there would be more work to be done which he believes Nnamdi Kanu will carry prominent but sincere agitators along. He finally said that first thing should come first; if Nnamdi Kanu is released, they sit down with him and have a common front and not planning a coup in the name of coming together.

 

Author:       Ugochinyere Onyechere

Biafrans are said to receive and adhere to a central command; that command must come from the leader of the Indigenous People Of Biafra, via his deputy, Mazi Uchenna Mefor. On countless occasions, while Mazi Nnamdi Kanu was still hosting Radio Biafra, he always tells Biafrans to always abide by his commandments if we truly love him. Without being told, Biafrans have in countless measures shown their love for their leader in undoubted ways. This time, we must once again keep this commandment; honoring our fallen heroes. Mazi Nnamdi Kanu has always displayed his love and resolutions to the fullness of time; unmeasurable, he has isolated the distractive points of the Nigerian government. If I should suggest, personally I would say the normal proceedings of remembering our fallen heroes should remain same; that is, gathering at a spot, just a picture of what we did at Aba and Nkpor in the recent times,  but who am I to go against the will of the master?

The order has been given, and as such, we must be prepared to make it happen. Though there have been fictitious misunderstandings, but this should be put on the side for the main time. Come 30th May should determine the full readiness of Biafrans, the world at large must hear us. All the clans, regions and states that made up Biafran land must be locked up.  The lands of Abia, Imo, Bayelsa, Delta, Enugwu, Igweocha (Rivers), Anambra, Ebonyi, Igbanke, Idoma, Akwa-Ibom, Cross-Rivers, and Igala must be at rest for 24 hours, by honoring those who have paid the ultimate price for our freedom via the process of remaining indoors. Buying and selling shouldn’t  be an excuse because they were killed for your sake. We must remember them because they fought gallantly to ensure the total emancipation of you and me. They must be remembered for they were innocent; they weren’t guilty of any crime or convicts. They must be remembered, for because of them, we have preferred death to living.

Our brothers, sisters, sons, daughters, fathers, mothers, aunties and uncles they were, for that reason, we must remember them. Their blood will not flow in vain, for we have sworn to restore Biafra. Our fallen heroes must be remembered because the world has failed to give them justice and peace; the world has paid deaf ears to the genocide and war crimes committed against Biafrans. The world celebrates holocausts, and so many events that enumerated the killing of people around the globe; here, the death of over six million people from a particular race have been swept under the carpet. Had it been the British, it would be a worldwide event, let be the Americans, heaven and earth will stand still. Same is applicable to other civilized countries, yet Biafrans have been on the back page of events. These are the vital issues that should motivate our people to honor our dead. We must give them this respect, regardless the circumstances surrounding their deaths.

When I heard of this event, I sorely wept; not because it is termed sit at home, but because I was made to retrieve the memories of Onitsha head bridge, National High school Aba, Igweocha uncountable killings and the events that took place from 30th May 1967-1970. Many died, under the swift nose of a civilized and democratic world. May I backslid the pictures, seeing children going down of malnutrition and hunger; schools, churches, and marketplaces raced with fire and bombs. The world was silent, and continuously they had remained silent. These were the reasons they trashed history studies in our schools today. Vehemently, Biafrans were killed, consciously they were brutalized. Even till date, we are yet in that bondage. Since the world has refused to talk about them, we will not be silent. Someone rejected by people shouldn’t reject his/herself, for fortune is prominent. Our fallen heroes must be remembered, and we owe them that respect.

At the moment, evangelism and street interviews should remain the cordial activities to be carried out by all eminent Biafrans. We must show the world how fanatic we are, they must understand the fact that we are mad over restoring Biafra. We must show the Nigerian government that we can’t be deterred with their triggers, nor their prison walls. Those they have found pleasure in killing is to be remembered, and as such, we must go without the fear of any monkey or baboon in the zoo. Indigenous People Of Biafra have always, been an emulative narrator. We have straight records of events, which have never been in place in the whole planet earth. With these affirmations, we have come to another point. Our fallen heroes must be remembered. All markets, public or private schools, public or private companies, banks, and all other public or private sectors in Biafra Land will be a suspense. Our heroes are being remembered, and that’s the vital reason to be indoors. The politicians should be convinced that we are the owners of our lands; so should the entire world be made to believe.

This exercise is the most little of all sacrifices one should pay in this struggle. Those who can not participate in the exercise should have themselves blamed for any misfortune that should befall them. There’s an adage that says that “a man with a burning house does not chase after rats’. All the business, markets and school administrators should not pretend to be above this order because the blood of those innocent Biafrans killed will be against them one day is too small to pay them back; rather we should honor them with it. We should always remember that they wouldn’t have died if not because of us. The greatest abomination to be committed in Biafra land is to go against this order. Biafran fallen heroes must be remembered, they are not just heroes, but great heroes that defeated the world without any defensive weapon. We must honor them.

The Nigerian government, I believed would have been planning on how to kill us again, though we are at all times prepared to die, but this is an order, from the highest chains of command of IPOB. Death is the portion of any traitor or disobedient fellow that shall not adhere to this simplest order. If you love Nnamdi Kanu, you must obey his last commands. Biafrans, obedient is better than sacrifice. A word they say is enough for a wise fellow.

Publisher: Prince Richmond C. Amadi

30th MAY BIAFRA'S 

ALL SAINTS DAY

Nwanna Benjamin

 
For 

Family writers 

30th may is a day we Biafrans shouldn't take for granted .because it's our heroes day. those who pay the price for us with their blood and life. they are our saint. so just sat the catholic respect and observe all saints day so should we Biafrans respect and also observe 30th of May. we should show our dead heroes that we living cherish their sacrifice and holds it dear to our heart. we should all make them happy and proud by showing solidarity to them that day. all Biafra should stay at home, no coming out for business, zoo government work and other activities on that day.
I call on all the provinces that made up Biafra to take part in this SIT AT HOME for our past heroes. We should be indoor praying to chukwuokikeabiama to destroy our enemies and also to our fallen heroes to torment their killer and never allow them have peace of mind and soul.
Freennamdikanu
Free Biafra

NNAMDI KANU VS NIGERIA GOVT: JUSTICE BINTA NYAKO, HANDS-OFF THE CASE NOW BECAUSE YOU ARE ALREADY CONFUSED

 BIAFRA: NIGERIA SITTING ON A TIME BOMB

By Ojani Chimezie

For Family Writers
The unification of Biafrans under IPOB and Mazi Nnamdi Kanu should send a strong message to the British and Nigerian governments that not even death can deter us from achieving our quest for Biafra. Without Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, we would have still be wallowing in ignorance, perpetual slavery and who knows by now, may be completely Islamized. The true love that abounds and the unity therein among Biafrans is unequaled which Hausa-Fulani and Yoruba counterpart is still leaking their wounds incurred from failed plots of divide and rule tactics. Biafrans wouldn't have known the hard truth about this contraption called Nigeria and the hidden agenda hypocritically mapped out by its colonial unapologetic master - British government. Biafrans are indebted to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, the icon of truth and justice who not only lightened our lives with undiluted truth about our existence in this experimental specimen called Nigeria but also empowered us with knowledge, filled us with love and oneness, else in darkness and emptiness would we still be in.

Over the years in the past, for the first time in the history of Biafra restoration all tribes and provinces in Biafra land are more united than ever. The continued incarceration of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu by the Nigeria Judicial wing which is championed by the Nigeria government show cases gross incompetency surrounding them and further proves the fact that Nigeria is a failed state. Biafrans cannot allow or sit and watch the Nigeria judiciary use unconstitutional judicial process in the case of the indefatigable Leader of Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB), Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. We therefore, place the world on notice on the looming calamity hovering in Nigeria state which can be averted to save lives and properties through the unconditional release of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu and full restoration of Biafra.

Biafra was once lost and forgotten until Mazi Nnamdi Kanu came with redemption message and revived our lost hope, brought back Biafra to the lime light and to Biafrans consciousness. There is no mincing words to say that Mazi Nnamdi Kanu is a man who lives in all Biafrans, a man that has millions of followers round the globe willing to lay down their lives towards Biafra restoration and waiting for his command should not be messed with or taken for granted. Evidently, United Biafrans are ready to exit Nigeria under the Leadership of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu to our Father land Biafra come what may! It is either Biafra or death!
Observing the hypocrisy of Britain, British citizens have the right to pull out of EU, the Scottish people have the right to quit UK a union they both willingly went into respectively for the betterment of their citizens unlike Biafrans that were forcefully amalgamated with the Hausa-Fulani and Yoruba conspirators without our prior consent. Catalonia, Scotland and Britain are all agitating for self-determination neither a case of single gunshot have been recorded in their protest nor its citizens incarcerated.
 Therefore, Biafrans call on the AU, UN, EU, all Human Rights organizations both local and international, international communities and people of Good conscience to do the needful against the injustice and extra judiciary killings of Biafrans in Nigeria and the threat on the life of Mazi Nnamdi Kanu the Leader of the Indigenous People of Biafra to save innocent lives from this impending doom that will leave no life untouched because our peaceful approach will elapse if something harmful happens to Mazi Nnamdi Kanu. Chukwu Okike Abiama Bless Mazi Nnamdi Kanu, IPOB worldwide and the United States of Biafra.

#Free Nnamdi Kanu!
#Free all Biafrans in detention!
#Free Biafra!

Edited by Orji Munachimso
For Family Writers

 SIT AT HOME: IPOB TO SHUT DOWN THE WHOLE OF BIAFRA LAND ON 30TH OF MAY 2017 IN RESPECT TO BIAFRAN FALLEN HEROES.

30th of May 2017 BIAFRA HEROES DAY is another day IPOB shall show case their governing power to Nigeria, Africa and the entire world. We shall shut down the whole of Biafra land in respect to our fallen heroes killed by Nigeria government. We shall use this opportunity again to tell the world that Biafra still controls her territory.

There will be no movement of any sort in the whole of Biafra Land in respect to the great sacrifice made by our fallen heroes. On 30th of May we shall pay our great Fathers, Mothers, children and friends who died in the course of restoring Biafra a befitting respect by SITTING AT HOME and pray that their soul should continue to fight THE spiritually battle while we fight the physical battle. We shall tell them that never shall we back down in this struggle until what they fought for is achieved.

IPOB in diaspora should follow their normal procedure. Those in Biafra land are advised to SIT AT HOME as mark of respect. There will be no movement on that day: Schools remains shut down on that day, every market both BIG and small remains SHUT DOWN, NO transportation, No business activities until the end of this historic remembrance ceremony.

Market associations’ leaders, transportation companies, church leaders, etc should adhere to this instructions and respect that day. We hope to get more directives from IPOB directorates on how that day will be observed