RWANDAN
GENOCIDE:
AN OPEN LETTER
TO THERESA MAY
10 April
2019.
Dear
Theresa May,
I am
delighted to write this onerous letter to you. This is my very first time of
writing officially to you since you took over the political baton from your
predecessor, David Cameron, who resigned shortly after it was announced that
his country had voted to leave the European Union. Saying congratulations to
you will be somewhat hypocritical considering the fact that the government
which you are solely navigating has so far not performed credibly that will
warrant any form of applause.
My primary
aim of writing this letter to you is to remind you and the people of Britain
that what goes around must surely comes around. And that no matter how long it
tarries, one day the chicken will return to roost. As no man, no matter how
swift, can run faster than his shadow.
Madam, I
was outrightly shocked to my born marrow after I happened upon a short post you
made on the 7th of April, 2019. In the said post on your Facebook page, you
warmly acknowledged the victims of Rwanda genocide. The Rwanda war (a war,
which lasted from 1990 to 1994, arose from the long-running dispute between the
Hutu and Tutsi groups within the Rwandan population), which consumed about 1.2
million innocent lives, has continually remain an indelible pogrom in the
global terrain. It was a war that showed the savage disposition of the black
man. Above all, I must not fail to commend you for hypocritically joining other
forerunners of peace and justice around the globe in remembering those innocent
Rwandans who were horrifically butchered in that irresponsible war.
Madam, I am
seriously worried over your double standard deposition and that of the British
government. I am saying this because Britain, after 58 years, has refused, and
even made several covert and overt effort in ensuring that the topic of Biafra
genocide is not discussed anywhere. In fact, it is also obvious that Britain
and other war mongers, who benefited from the spoils of the war, have been able
to ensure that the media giants around their domain never make the mistake of
discussing the issue of Biafra genocide, and even if they will do, the
discussion will be marred with so much subjectivity. The mission is simple,
Make Biafra the villain and make those economic hitmen who orchestrated and
benefited from the war the victims.
It is now
glaring to all and sundry that there exist a monumental conspiracy against the
issue of Biafra genocide. What transpired in Rwanda cannot and will never for
any reason be approximated to the blood bath which took place in the Biafran
and Nigerian war. Many can choose to buy into the misleading narrative of
'civil war', but to me, there was no iota of civility in that war. It was more
of a total annihilation of the Biafran specie. The motto of the war was simple,
'clean them up by any means and take over the oil'. The oil was more relevant
than the lives of the indigenous people.
Madam,
there are graphic and video recordings on the Nigerian and Biafran war
available to the public. It shows how millions of children from Biafra, which
is presently known as the Eastern part of Nigeria were starved to death during
the war. Considering verifiable data at the public disposal, about 2 million
innocent children died as a result of starvation. There were no food and
medication. Children turned to skeletons with bloated stomach. While the total
of 5 to 6 million civilians died in the senseless war.
During this
ethnic pogrom, BBC, a British owned media house, was lying to the world that it
wasn't a war and that what was going on was merely a police action to quell a
mild rebellion. While this mindless mendaciousness was being sold to the global
community, the British government and their allies, with interest in the oil
rich Biafra, were secretly arming the Nigerian government to commit the most
hideous crime and genocide in the history of mankind.
The war at
the end of the day amounted to a huge collateral damage. Human and material
resources were unreasonably wasted. Though the kingpins of the war will always
say, 'no victor and no vanquish', but unfortunately, such bogus mantra is
nothing but a spinless lie designed to rewrite what ought to be. Biafra lost
millions of promising lives and their properties worth billions of pounds (in
the present day estimate) were confiscated. Thousands of industrialists and families
who had huge sums in banks lost it. Some were given 20 pounds out of the
thousands they had before the war while others never received a dime.
Madam, the
British government that spearheaded and also gave logistics to their surrogate
in Nigeria during the war, has never for one day remembered and show a
heartfelt remorse for the criminal role they played in that war. Is it not an
act of hypocrisy and wickedness of the highest order? It worries me, to a great
extent, that the British government has become more recalcitrant in ensuring
that the injustice done to Biafrans during and after the war is never
discussed, and expiation fully made on it. Moreover, efforts have not been made
to bring to book those depraved hitmen who orchestrated the war for their selfish
aggrandizement.
However
Madam, as the number one citizen of Britain, you may attempt to feign ignorance
of Biafra genocide, but I promise you one thing, a day is coming when the
chicken will return to roost. The entire British empire in one way or the other
will have to taste the same poison they served Biafra in 1967 to 1970. It may
not be now but in the near future. Probably, the future generation may
ignorantly bear the consequences of the dastardly action of Harold Wilson.
Conclusively
Madam, I will like to throw up a challenge to you. If you truly think the
British government has regretted and repented from the prominent part they
played in the Nigeria and Biafra war, I will suggest you use 30th of May, 2019
(the day Biafrans around the universe use to remember and mourn their loved
ones who were victims of 1967 to 1970 war), to show a warm solidarity to
Biafrans as they will be remembering the victims of Britain and Nigeria's
callousness. This solidarity can be demonstrated by asking BBC to run a one
week video documentary that will show full footage of kwashiorkor stricken
children from Biafra, and how international markets, institutions of learning
and residential areas were mercilessly bombed and looted by the Nigerian
troops. Also, how mothers and their young daughters were brutally molested and
raped in the presence of their husbands and fathers.
This
solidarity can be further demonstrated through a sincere change in the aspect
of policy direction in the Biafra question, which means that Britain as a
matter of national pride and importance must compel Nigeria to do the needful
so that there can be an end to this long overdue issue of Biafra being an
independent nation. If this can be done, then I can say that Britain has
regretted and repented from the despicable role they played in the Biafra
genocide.
Accept my
letter with utmost sincerity.
Kalu
Nwokoro Idika
Kalu
Nwokoro Idika is a political analyst
for Family
Writers Press.
IS THIS THE BEGINNING OF
THE END?
The current state of the Biafran struggle for
self-determination has transcended the level the Nigeria political power brokers
can contend with. The case has snowballed into an international matter which is
capable of questioning the future of the Nigerian state and its sovereignty.
The on-going case between the federal Government of Nigeria versus Nnamdi Kanu
over the trumped up allegation that the latter committed treasonable felony,
for which he and the four others were arraigned at the federal high court of
the federal Republic of Nigeria, and later alleged to have jumped bail has
taken a new dimension. But as it was widely reported in the Nigerian media and
from principal witnesses and the lawyer of the foremost Biafran leader that the
security of the state with all state security and war apparatus invading the
house of the IPOB leader at Afararukwu in Abia state with the intention to
eliminate him and in the process State violence was visited on the entire
community where lives were massively lost and the state of the safety of the
IPOB leader and his whereabouts was unknown after the military operation.
Subsequently after the above scenario, the court reconvened to continue with
the trials only for the case to get twisted when the court insisted that the
IPOB leader must appear in court to face trail over the case brought against
him by the prosecutor which in this case is the Federal Government of Nigeria.
The argument for and against over why the IPOB leader who later appeared in
Israel and have been making series of broadcasting statements on Radio on the
events surrounding how the state, some Igbo leaders, conspired with the bench
to get him eliminated while he is still under the protective bail of the court
of which he had vowed never to appear to again to answer the allegation of
treasonable felony placed on him by the Nigerian state and he continues to
vehemently insist that he has committed no crime for which he could be accused
let alone treasonable felony, as what he is agitating for ,is the freedom of
his people under the concept of self-determination and secession which is well
embedded in the Nigerian constitution, extant laws which is the common laws and
international conventions, treaties and conference resolutions . He made series
of revelations concerning the Nigerian leadership and how and why he, could
never get justice in a Nigerian court presided over by a Nigerian judge.
Following Nnamdi Kanu’s decision not to
appear in court again, there has been series of court arguments in which at a
point the court was contemplating forfeiting the bail bond of the sureties that
stood in for his bail and there were counter opposition to this intending
decision of the court that eventually made one of the sureties suing the judge
of the court to another division of the court seeking for his right to be
protected by his court. This action was followed by subsequent Binta Nyako’s
court ruling to absolve the sureties of any wrong doings and decided to revoke
the bail right granted the IPOB leader and issued a bench warrant arrest
against anywhere the IPOB leader is sited and be brought to court to face his
trials. This above order of the court was made against all the entreaties by
legal representations of the IPOB leader and the others to present the actual
information concerning why their clients could no longer appear in court, every
attempts by the defendants representatives to present these facts to the court
of what the security operatives did which led to the disappearance of their
client was rebuffed by the trial Judge.
The reaction of the above insistence of the
court that the embattled IPOB Leader must face trial took a new twist when he
declared in one of his radio broadcast on Radio Biafra, London that he is not a
Nigerian and he is suing the Nigerian Government to a court in the British
court challenging the decision of the Nigerian court to revoked his bail and many
other reliefs that he may be demanding to advance the course of the Biafran
struggle.
In his last broadcast on Radio Biafra, the
Biafran Leader exposed some section of the Nigerian laws predicated on some
sections of the provision of 1999 Nigerian constitution and some existing laws
that legalized his demand for a separate Biafran State out of Nigeria. He spoke
so confidently about the justiciability of these laws as they are written in
Black and white which formed parts of the common laws of the federation of
Nigeria and no court in the country has any powers to assumed any jurisdiction
concerning these sets laws when they are connected to process for demand for
outright secession or struggle for self-determination for a separate homeland
out of Nigeria, once the process do not contravene the process laid down in the
criminal code of the federal Republic of Nigeria. The citation of some of these
laws that he cited are;
1, That under the Shagari administration in
1983, there was a law passed by the National Assembly in Lagos during that
political era titled “The Law of the Federation of Nigeria” which enable any
Region or a people, who felt that they are political, economic and
socio-cultural oppressed within Nigeria State, to be assisted by the government
of the country to freely exited the Nigerian federation to seek for separate
homeland where the above deprivation can be redressed.
2. That there was a decree promulgated under
the general Babagida administration titled “The Laws of the Federation of
Nigeria, 1990, cap 10” The above law re-consolidated the rights of secession
and self-determination to any people and parts of Nigeria, which was initially
asserted in the 1983 laws, can comfortable pullout of the Nigerian federation
with the supports of the Nigerian State.
3. That there was also consolidation of the
above two laws that legalized the calls and struggle for secession and calls
for self-determination under Nigerian common laws passed under the democratic
administration of President Olusegun Obasanjo titled “The Law of the Federation
of Nigeria” passed in 2004. This Act powered Nigeria to be a state party
positively with all technical assistance to any Region or peoples in Nigeria
seriously advocating for exit out of the Nigerian federation. But from all
indications, it could be assumed that it is the criminal class political
elites, traditional rulers and business and corporate professionals along North
and South divide who are the albatross and the stumbling block to the
enforcement of these above laws to segments and groups who had long rejected
the unworkable and fraudulent National unity that has bought deaths, genocide,
ethnic cleansing, pains, under-development, poverty, massive uncontained
corruption practices within the public and private sectors at all strata of the
Nigerian society.
The Nnamdi Case versus Federal Republic of
Nigeria has been slated for a court in the United Kingdom on the 29th of April,
2019. Nigeria’s legal representation will be expected to make appearance at the
hearing and trials of this historic case. Many paradox box and hidden secrets
which were initially not made known to the Nigeria people will be uncovered
under oath. And the legality for demanding for one separate country out of
Nigeria will be tested. All Nigerian laws that supported the calls for
self-determination in the country will be tested. All international treaties
and conventions both at the international and at the regional level which
Nigeria is a signatories to will be invoked. What amount to acts of treasonable
felony within the context of the Nigeria criminal code system? Why the South
and the North be run or criminal code versus penal code system if the country is
truly a united federation and why the federation created by the British should
not be urgently terminated? Why the amalgamation document of 1914, if such
document existed, must be presented in the British court on the 29th of this
month in the UK court and the legality of such document and its contents having
any legal effect of the law binding consequences further on the remnants of the
succeeding generations who are now the victims of such evil amalgamation? And
whether the independence constitutions and the subsequent ones, are subjected
to the popular endorsement of those who were referred as Nigerians via a
fallout of an outcomes of popular referendum.
All self-determination and separatists in
Nigeria must developed vested interests in the case between Nnamdi Kanu and the
federal Republic of Nigeria, later this month in the United Kingdom and be
ready to take their stand over the fallout of the case in question. Our
problems as a people started by the British in 1914, may also be finally be
settled in the British court once and for all.
MAKANJUOLA ADIGUN MUHAMMED.
Mary Slessor Was A Big Lair
Mary Slessor Was A Big Lair
Beware of white folks and their history. What
i shall prove to you now will shock you . The so call history written by white
folks and propagated by church missionaries accusing the igbo of killing twins
was nothing but a fabricated lie.
They said mary slessor stopped the killing of
twins in ala igbo , Asi asi !!
Think again about the name ejima ,
"Ejiri mara ibe ya or Eji mara ibe ya
".
It means when you see one , you have seen the
other.
To do this you have to have them as grown up
who are part of society where they showcase their unity of soul which is the
true nature of ejiiri mara ibe ya (twins).
This name explained properly how the igbos
view twins .
They were seen as replicas of one another or
identical humans, thus it is normal to tell one what you want to tell the other
and do to one what you do to the other . When gift are given to one it is also
given to the other .
This name in itself has no negative
connotations but positive all the way.
Therefore it proved that the igbo's had
always respected twins.
Here are more Profs ;
1. Mary slessor had no single book on how she
stop the killing of twins in Igbo land.
2. How can you stop the killing of twins but
kill the same people as slaves ? (Please refer to trans Atlantic slavery)
3. Wikipedia and other reference works never
mentioned that there were such practice in Ala Igbo .
4 Maungo park also discovered river Niger Asi
asi !!
5. No omenala custodian agree that this ever
happened.
6. The very existence of Nso Ani Igbo
disagree with this infanticide story.
7. The white folk Marry slessor was a
colonialist , spy and a cheap blackmailer.
A stranger can't tell you your history, worse
of all an enemy can keep your good records.
Copied from mazi Akajiofo
#SupportBiafraReferendum
#GOJOINIPOB NOW
No comments:
Post a Comment